Veradigm (Allscripts) vs eClinicalWorks
Veradigm owns the sub-specialties. eClinicalWorks owns general practice. Which one you are decides the answer.
Where they stand in independent practice
Across the 37,310 providers whose EMR is identifiable in the federal registry, Veradigm (Allscripts) accounts for 13.2% and eClinicalWorks for 15.2%.
Where they meet, by specialty
Specialties in which at least one of the two is a registry top-three system. A dash means that vendor is not in the top three for that specialty — not that it is absent from the market.
Which one to shortlist
- You are joining, or merging into, a hospital or health system.
- Your practice is smaller than Allscripts (Veradigm) sells to. eClinicalWorks lists 1 (solo) as its smallest tier, against 6–15.
- You want charting, scheduling and billing from one vendor rather than stitched together.
- You want a number before you talk to sales. eClinicalWorks publishes $449–$599 per provider / month; Allscripts (Veradigm) quotes privately.
Get a real comparison for your practice
Everything above is what we can say about these two in general. What we cannot tell you from a page is what either costs at your provider count, in your specialty. Tell us and we will get you quotes from the vendors that actually fit — free, and we never charge practices.
Tell Us About Your Practice
Other comparisons
Share figures are EMR Match Research analysis of the CMS NPPES Direct-endpoint data, July 2026 dissemination (n=37,310 identified providers) — the same source as our open data page, so the two can never disagree. This measures the EMR identified by the Direct-messaging endpoint a practice registered with the federal NPPES registry. Vendors that sell mainly to small independent practices are systematically under-represented, because small practices are the least likely to have registered an endpoint at all. Read it as a floor, not as installed base. Ratings and prices are as published by the review source and the vendor; sourcing on our methodology page.